Second non-import agreementsThe second non-import agreements in 1767 were triggered by the Townshend Acts, which imposed taxes on British imports into America, including paint, paper, lead, glass and tea. In protest of the new taxes, Boston immediately reinstated its embargo on British imports. New York followed in 1768 and Philadelphia in 1769 after stocking imports. Traders in the southern colonies did not accede to the embargo. Smuggling of goods into colonies other than Great Britain has become a common practice, referring to the De Gaspee case. British exports were again severely affected and pressure again forced Parliament to lift townshend tariffs on all raw materials except tea. The non-import agreement (1768), which required American colonies to purchase English products through foreign countries, was the result of Britain`s attempt to find new sources of income for colonial defence and administration. Among these sources were the Townshend Acts, which imposed tariffs on glass, lead, paper, tea and paint, which passed through Parliament in June 1767 and came into force four months later. Most settlers went through difficult times in the 1760s, when money became scarcer, trade declined and the cost of living increased. Under such conditions, traders and consumers were reluctant to take part in a new campaign against British colonial policy and those who were prepared sought more conservative ways to protest tariffs. Non-import agreementsFacts and basic information: The French and Indian war (seven years of war) had left Britain with a massive war debt and the British were looking for ways to reduce the war debt by imposing new taxes in the colonies. Tensions in the colonies increased due to the demands and taxes imposed by the British Parliament. There were no American settlers in the British Parliament, which led to the reputation: “No taxation without representation!” American politicians and patriots, led by the intelligence firm Sons of Liberty, began protesting British laws and taxes.
The sons of freedom and American merchants launched a boycott of English products in response to the new taxes. In protest of the British Crown`s Townshend Act, which set taxes on a large number of goods, Boston merchants and traders entered into an agreement not to import or export goods to the United Kingdom. A. What was the stated purpose of this agreement? How else could this agreement have helped to strengthen American opposition to British imperial policy? Non-import agreements and the sons of freedomThe sons of freedom were determined to enforce non-import agreements, which incited awareness of colonial abuses against British rule. The actions and protests of the sons of freedom have shifted from peaceful rallies, from boycotts and small secret actions to public demonstrations of riots and violence. The sons of Liberty`s intimidating statement above against merchant William Jackson clearly shows one of the methods they have adopted to impose non-import agreements while encouraging the settlers to act. The merchant in question, William Jackson, may also have been publicly “cryed and plucked.” The impact of the Boston non-import agreement and all similar agreements has been considerable. About 60 merchants and merchants signed the agreement on August 1, 1768, and within two weeks, all but sixteen Boston merchants, merchants and business owners had joined the boycott.
Boston craftsmen, craftsmen and other merchants signed the agreement with joy in the hope that the boycott would generate business for them. In the space of weeks and months, almost all ports and regions of the Thirteen Colonies adopted similar boycotts to protest and undermine the Townshend Revenue Act, although many southern traders and traders with loya tendencies