In addition, each of the persons designated by the parties to be part of the arbitral tribunal (arbitral tribunal or arbitration board) is called an arbitrator, not to be confused with an arbitrator. Although their wording is similar, which leads to frequent errors, these two concepts allude to different realities. – Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Arbitrage. TransLegal, online. Available from: www.translegal.com/exercise/arbitration-and-arbitrage-2 Carmona v. Lincoln Millennium Car Wash, Inc., B248143 (Pub. Order 9. May 2014): In the most successful councils and councils of the Court of Ministers of the Member States, the educational councils are also present. The Council of the best commissions of the creation of the property, the first place is the most important for the search for better products. In finding that the agreement was “imbued with impitoyability”, the court unreasmentedly pointed out the “systemic lack of reciprocity” of the agreement in favour of the employer.
The Procedural Tribunal held that the arbitration agreement was unscrupulous, both procedurally and substantively. The Court of Justice held that the agreement presented “a high degree of procedural scruples” on the basis that: (1) the agreement was presented on a “take it or leave it” basis; (2) the employers did not provide the workers with a copy of the arbitration rules provided for in the agreement; and (3) some of the most important parts of the agreement have not been translated into Spanish. Lincoln Millennium Car Wash, Inc. and Silver Wash, Inc. asked their employees to sign an employment contract shortly after they were hired. The employees were native Spanish speakers and did not read English. Some parts of the documents signed by the staff were in Spanish and others in English. Employees thought they were signing work requests that they understood were necessary to work in car washes. The laundromat manager did not explain the documents to the employees or tell them that they were regoing their right to appear in court. Los términos arbitration y arbitrage suelen confundirse a menudo, pero, como veremos a continuación, aluden a dos realidades distintas.
In order to avoid congestion in court schedules, parties often agree that their disputes will be decided through arbitration. In determining whether the content of the agreement was ruthless, the General Court took into account the degree of reciprocity of the agreement. . . .